Fossil deemed bird, not dinosaur

New research finds that the earliest known bird, Archaeopteryx, is in fact a bird, not a dinosaur as some scientists had suggested. However, the line between feathered dinosaurs and birds remains fuzzy.?

By Alicia Chang,?Associated Press / May 29, 2013

This image shows the skeleton of a recently discovered dinosaur dubbed Aurornis xui that roamed China during the middle to late Jurassic period. A new study finds the discovery restores the fossil creature Archaeopteryx back to the ?bird? branch of the evolutionary family tree.

AP Photo/Thierry Hubin, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

Enlarge

A raven-sized creature that lived about 150 million years ago is back on its perch, a new study says.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; // google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

The creature called Archaeopteryx (ahr-kee-AHP'-teh-rihx) was widely considered the earliest known bird. That status was called into question two years ago by Chinese scientists, who proposed yanking it off the "bird" branch of the evolutionary family tree and moving it onto a closely related lineage of birdlike?dinosaurs.

Now an international team led by the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences believes Archaeopteryx should indeed be considered a bird.

The famed fossil was discovered in 1861 in Germany and quickly became an evolutionary icon. Archaeopteryx possessed part-bird, part-reptile traits. It sported broad wings and feathers like a bird, but it also had three-fingered claws, sharp teeth and a long bony tail similar to a?dinosaur.

Fossil discoveries of feathered?dinosaurs?in northeastern China over the past two decades have challenged Archaeopteryx's place in bird evolution.

The latest evidence suggesting Archaeopteryx had more in common with birds than?dinosaurs?comes from the discovery of an intact, well-preserved skeleton of a previously unknown?dinosaur?dubbed Aurornis xui. It lived during the middle to late Jurassic era in China's Liaoning province where many early birds and feathered dinosaurs?roamed.

Belgian researcher Pascal Godefroit and his team compared the anatomy of the newly discovered?dinosaur fossil to a variety of birds and?dinosaurs?to determine their relationship. The analysis, published in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature, classifies Archaeopteryx back into the bird category.

Lawrence Witmer, a bird evolution expert at Ohio University, called the analysis compelling. But he said it's still tough to tease apart that segment of the family tree.

"All of these little feathered species running and flapping around ... were all very similar," Witmer, who had no role in the research, said in an email.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/science/~3/z3-eLOmbazw/Fossil-deemed-bird-not-dinosaur

bells palsy channel 5 news uc berkeley harrison barnes brett ratner stevie nicks anchorman